Launched in 2003 when Louisville Metro Government was formed, the Greater Louisville Project was created to collect and leverage data to make our community better. Over time, we have measured four deep drivers in our community: Health, Jobs, Education, and Quality of Place. Our data has been used by philanthropies, nonprofits, government offices, and the private sector to track our progress against our community’s goals.
In 2020, in response to the killing of Breonna Taylor, leaders in Louisville’s Black community partnered to create a document outlining a holistic approach to what Black communities across this country need for systemic restructuring. The document, entitled A Path Forward categorizes the changes into 5 areas: Jobs, justice, education, health, and housing.
The Greater Louisville Project is working with the authors of A Path Forward and holding open community conversations. Here you will learn about the data around a specific topic and help to determine what additional data should be measured in order to ensure that we have a clear understanding of the current situation and can quantify the changes over time.
As opposed to the annual report presented in past years, the 2020 Report will comprise a series of mini reports that align with specific issues addressed in A Path Forward.
October 2020: Digital Divide
November 2020: Housing (Coming Soon)
December 2020: Mental and Emotional Well Being (Coming Soon)
January – June 2021: TBD (Coming Soon)
For each indicator, Greater Louisville Project assigns cities into one of three groups (high-performing, middle-of-the-pack, and low-performing) based on how they compare to other cities. The assignment is based on how cities naturally cluster on that indicator. Sometimes, the differences between cities are very small, and the difference between a city ranked 5th and 6th could simply be a matter of the sampling error that arises from using survey data. Thus, rather than always make a division that declares the top 5 to be the top tier, we use a natural breaks algorithm to look for a cluster of cities that is outperforming the rest, a cluster that is about average, and a cluster that is lagging. This clustering gives us a better indication of where Louisville is thriving and where Louisville has room to learn from cities that are doing better.
Z-scores (or standardization) is a way to combine data with different units of measurement into a single index. The z-score is a measure of how far away a city (or census tract, etc.) is from the average city. In order to be comparable across different units of measurement, the z-score is the distance from the mean measured in standard deviations (e.g. if Louisville has a z-score of 1 it means Louisville is 1 standard deviation above the mean of its peer cities).
Data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's County Health Rankings use z-scores and all z-scores are relative to the mean of Louisville's peer cities. (On the County Health Rankings site z-scores are relative to all the counties in each state - thus z-scores reported by GLP will be different, because we are using a different reference group). The Greater Louisville Project also uses z-scores in our multidimensional poverty index, which compares each census tract to the mean of all census tracts in Louisville.